Inequity manifests itself in many ways within the City of
Portland. In a city that prides itself on its progressive policies and green
transportation options, the disparities in TriMet’s bus stop accommodations are
inexcusable. The contrast between the built environment and amenities at bus
stops in Central Portland versus East Portland is abhorrent and needs to
change. I implore TriMet to prioritize improvements to the “top three” worst
bus stops, as identified by OPAL’s (Organizing People, Activating Leaders) East
Portland Bus Project.
OPAL, a local transit justice and advocacy nonprofit,
started their exploration of bus stops in East Portland in 2011 (1). After
receiving $63,000 in funds from Metro’s Regional Travel Options grant program
(1), OPAL kicked their plans into action. OPAL’s goal was to empower East
Portland residents to lead the process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing
improvements to stops along major bus routes in their neighborhood (1). Some of
the routes looked at include bus numbers 9, 10, and 14 (2).
Clearly, as OPAL discovered, this issue of inequity in bus
stop accommodations occurs at the local level, and thus requires local level
change. As a regional agency, TriMet holds the power to listen to and act on
OPAL’s recommendations.
OPAL’s three “winners” included the following bus stops (2),
listed with their respective average on and offs per day.
#1) SE Powell & 122nd (248 on/offs)
Source: Portland Afoot |
#2) SE Powell & 127th (38 on/offs)
Source: Portland Afoot |
#3) SE 82nd & Foster (285 on/offs)
Source: Portland Afoot |
Official TriMet policy recommends installing a rain shelter
at bus stops that average 50 boardings each day (3). Two of the stops OPAL
identified meet this criterion, and still do not have said rain shelter.
Currently,
these stops look like they belong in a different city when compared to a
downtown streetcar stop.
Source: Portland Condo Loft Search |
In addition to the importance from a policy perspective, I
feel that this issue has a great deal of significance from an equity
perspective as well. Spatial mismatch, gentrification, and rising housing costs
have led to low-income people and communities of color living further from
employment opportunities and depending on transit. Despite high transit use,
accommodations such as shelters, benches, and lighting are disproportionately
missing from bus stops in East Portland. All of Portland’s transit riders,
regardless of class, race, or geography, deserve these features at their bus
stops.
Improvements to the built environment can also increase
ridership, which directly benefits TriMet. Critics may cite the costs of
improving these stops, but I believe that the long-term benefits and equity
considerations outweigh this concern. The Portland Plan strives for healthy
connected cities, equity, and affordability (4). As a partner in this plan, TriMet
needs to step up and show East Portland that their bus stops deserve just as
much attention as the streetcar.
Clearly, the lens through which we view public transit
impacts how that transit takes shape. If we continue to focus on transit as an
economic development tool and tourism enhancer, we will continue to perpetuate
an inequitable Portland. We need to shift this thinking towards using the lenses
of job connection, health, equity, and self-sufficiency to make public transit
priorities. OPAL focuses on transit-dependent riders, rather than
transit-oriented development. Their focus on empowering these riders to lead
community-based participatory research also addresses issues of access,
mobility, equity, and the social determinants of health.
Having gone to past OPAL meetings, I think that TriMet also needs
to take cues from how OPAL does their work and engages community members. Their
bus stop project is just one part of OPAL’s work; other aspects include Bus
Riders Unite! and Campaign for a Fair Transfer (5). The process of choosing the
“top three” bus stops was community-led, with area residents as the
researchers.
Source: Portland Afoot |
The final meeting to decide on the worst bus stops took place in
East Portland, at the Rosewood Café on SE 162nd and Stark (2).
OPAL’s meetings include food, childcare, and Spanish translation. These
meetings also take place at times convenient for many working families, usually
on the weekends, or in the evenings. These details and accommodations
significantly impact the turnout at meetings and level of empowerment and
engagement present amongst community members.
As Portland grows in size and diversity, TriMet needs to
address the disparities that OPAL has so clearly highlighted. East Portland
residents deserve investment from TriMet, to ensure that their regular bus
stops are safe, attractive, and enjoyable places to wait at. TriMet’s
commitment to their riders should pay extra attention to those riders most
dependent on their services. OPAL has already done the work; all TriMet needs
to do is listen and act.
- http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=41929
- http://portlandafoot.org/2013/05/bus-riders-unite-names-east-portlands-three-most-ridiculously-bad-bus-stops/
- http://trimet.org/pdfs/publications/bus-stop-guidelines.pdf
- http://www.portlandonline.com/portlandplan/index.cfm?c=58269
- http://www.opalpdx.org/transit-justice-health-campaign/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.