Showing posts with label Portland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Portland. Show all posts

Monday, June 10, 2013

Portland should embrace new bike share technology

Bike sharing systems have skyrocketed in popularity over the last 10 years in the United States. Minneapolis, Washington DC, Denver, Philadelphia, Boston and now New York have extensive networks of bike sharing docks placed on street corners, plazas and parks throughout the city. The docking station was the key innovation that addressed issues of security, payment, and circulation that plagued past attempts to implement a bike sharing scheme. But new technology is integrating the functions of the docking station into the bikes themselves, offering promising benefits to both users and operators that may catalyze another wave of expansion of bike sharing in the future. Portland, the top bike city in the country, should lead the way in deploying this technology when they roll out bike sharing next year.

OpEd | State | TriMet angers many, requires oversight

Photo credit: KGW.com

Did you know that TriMet fares are now among the highest in the nation (Gianola, 2013)? That’s right, a monthly adult TriMet pass is $100, while in Philadelphia, its $83, $72 in Los Angeles and just $70 in Boston (Gianola, 2013). Yet all three cities have operation far more extensive than Portland’s. So why does public transit cost so much in Portland? TriMet General Manager Neil McFarlane wants you to blame the recession and the high cost of TriMet’s union health benefits (Gianola, 2013). He hoped you wouldn’t find out about the $910,000 in pay raises he approved for the highest echelon of TriMet management in 2012, even as he publicly stated that he had frozen their pay (Rose, 2013). “How could this happen right under our noses?” you may ask. This was able to happen because no one was watching. While TriMet management increased fairs, cut service, and gave themselves raises, no one was paying attention. To ensure this can’t happen again, Oregon lawmakers have called on Secretary of State Kate Brown to conduct an unprecedented audit of operations and finances at the state's largest public transit agency (Rose J. , 2013).

Vice-chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Economic Development, Rep. Chris Gorsek (D-Troutdale) is the chief sponsor of the proposal, an amendment to his House Bill 3316. HB3316 was intended to regulate TriMet’s governance, transferring operational and finical oversight from TriMet’s board of directors to Metro (Staff, 2013). However, Gorsek simultaneously realized he didn’t have wide support for restructuring and became aware of major management issues at TriMet. He took the opportunity to push for a large scale audit instead (Rose J. , 2013). While the audit will possibly take longer than the original plan - Brown's office plans to have the audit finished before the 2014 legislative session (Thompson, 2013) – it ensures a much more thorough understanding  of exactly what is going on inside the transit agency and why. This is an extremely prudent step, prior to taking any major action which could have unforeseen repercussions. While it’s obvious that things need to change inside TriMet, I believe it’s worth taking the time to do it right.


Op-Ed | Local | Idling Reduction: A Common Sense Plan

Old habits are hard to break. To most, idling a car may seem fairly harmless, but in fact, there are many adverse effects. Carbon emissions have a major impact on air quality, with implications for public health and the environment, as we all know. One way to lessen these emissions is to reduce needless pollution from idling. However, most drivers don’t think twice about running their engine while the car is not in motion. For this reason, the City of Portland and Multnomah County need to work together to create idling regulations for passenger vehicles.

The two municipalities have worked together briefly on this issue before, during the Idling Gets You Nowherepublic outreach campaign in the summer of 2011. As part of that effort, Mayor Adams’ office convened an idling reduction task force to look into various options for addressing the issue.  Multnomah County took the lead on outreach by creating an informational website, hanging “Idling Gets You Nowhere” banners across the Hawthorne Bridge and mobilizing volunteers to hand out postcards explaining the dangers of vehicular idling during bridge lifts and at community events.

The partnership makes sense in light of the two municipalities’ efforts to reduce carbon emissions. In 2009, the City of Portland joined forces with Multnomah County to adopt the ClimateAction Plan, a three-year plan to put us on a path to achieve a 40 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 and an 80 percent reduction by 2050. “The Climate Action Plan commits the City and Multnomah County to 93 actions over the next three years and establishes 18 objectives for 2030 (City of Portland, 2009).” However, in the whole 70 page document, idling is mentioned only twice.


Sunday, June 9, 2013

Dangerous by Design: Portland's Unsignalized Intersections

Source: BikePortland.org

             The image above depicts the current intersection treatment at NE Going Street, looking north on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (MLK).

             Imagine you are a cyclist at this intersection, crossing the seemingly always-busy MLK by riding west on NE Going Street. As you wait for the traffic to pass you notice a car in the right-hand lane slowing to a stop just before the “zebra crossing.” The motorist looks at you and begins waving their hand, nodding and mouthing “go ahead.” Their behavior clearly states, “proceed, I am stopping for you.”

             This is where the problem begins.

Friday, June 7, 2013

State Funding of Bike Pedestrian Programs Op-Ed

The Problem:
When we look at the current trend of the Federal Government they have gotten out of the business of funding large infrastructure project in United States. The current US Secretary of Transportation has had pressure put on him to make the budget for infrastructure funding even smaller at the state level. Programs like “safe routes to schools” and “National Transportation Alternative Clearinghouse” have been cut back drastically and are leaving the majority of the free money for investment in the programs that support bike and pedestrian infrastructure gone. This brings into to question whether our growing population of bikers in Portland will slowly begin to decline and our goals of becoming “Bike City, USA” will disappear as well.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Op-Ed: East Portland Bus Stops Deserve Attention

Inequity manifests itself in many ways within the City of Portland. In a city that prides itself on its progressive policies and green transportation options, the disparities in TriMet’s bus stop accommodations are inexcusable. The contrast between the built environment and amenities at bus stops in Central Portland versus East Portland is abhorrent and needs to change. I implore TriMet to prioritize improvements to the “top three” worst bus stops, as identified by OPAL’s (Organizing People, Activating Leaders) East Portland Bus Project.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Op-Ed: Volunteer Bike Counters Will Be Out of Work!

Bikeportland.org

The Portland City Club’s report on bicycles has done a very comprehensive job of summarizing the current state of affairs and future of cycling in Oregon. With the report’s release everyone has been abuzz about the recommendation for a 4% tax on new bike sales. I’m on the fence over whether it’s necessary or not. I want to look past the bike-tax that has been making the headlines and look at one of the things the tax would be used to pay for: automatic bike counters, like the one on Hawthorne Bridge. More automatic bike counters around the city will mean hundreds of volunteer bike counters will be out of work. And that’s a good thing, because automatic bike counters will provide more data to support future bike infrastructure and volunteer bike counters will be free to pursue other unselfish civic co-production commitments.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Local Op-Ed: Extend and Improve the Old Town / Chinatown Pedestrian Zone!



Old Town / Chinatown Pedestrian Zone.  From The Portland Mercury

Picture this: it's midnight, and downtown is alive with activity.  The sidewalks are filled with people enjoying sidewalk dining in the cool night air, and crowds of pedestrians wander the streets.  Pedi-cabs slowly work their way though the revelers, and all without a car in sight!  This could be the future of Portland's Old Town/Chinatown district, but only if the City Council makes the right decision this week.  Since early this year a small part of the city has been closed to vehicles on weekend nights, creating a safer and more welcoming area for pedestrians.  Residents, nearby businesses, the Portland Police Bureau, and the Mayor have all expressed their support for the program (Oregonian). 

Area Closed to Cars.  From Portland Office of Neighborhood Involvement

But without City Council action, cars will soon return to the streets and once again create a nightly scene of congestion and conflict.  By voting to extend and improve the program when they meet June 5th,  City Council can help create a safe, vibrant nightlife for Portland and again demonstrate that this is a city that values its pedestrians (City Council Ordinance).

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Bicycle Tourism as Economic Stimulus: Seriously?! Yes, Seriously.

$400 million. That’s how much bicycle tourism, in Oregon, generated in 2012.

Travel Oregon Tweet
Travel Oregon announces bicycle tourism success on Twitter. Source: Author

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Op-Ed: Portland: Replace parking minimums with parking markets

Parking isn’t free. The assumption that it has no costs or the stipulation that it should be free ignore the fact that space is a scarce resource. Scarce resources have value and public policy is incredibly influential in determining how that value is allocated in the marketplace. Minimum parking requirements distort the markets for land and transportation by bundling the costs of parking with the costs of housing. Portland should repeal the recent decision to set minimum parking requirements for new apartment buildings over 30 units. In its place, the city should provide neighborhoods the option to create a well-functioning, well-regulated local parking market through Parking Benefit Districts. (Kolozsvari and Schoup 2003)

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Does the MAX increase property values?

There have been many inquiries into how proximity to a light rail or rapid rail station affects values of nearby properties.  

Monday, May 27, 2013

The P Word... and its controversy.


Parking. Everyone seems to have an opinion on parking. Some people think we need more, some think we need less. Some are adamant about parking requirements for new developments and some say parking requirements prevent development from happening in the first place. Donald Shoup believes the latter. His article “Free Parking or Free Markets” makes a strong case that the cost of parking is usually hidden and placed on non-drivers. His study on parking requirements and the effects of parking policy makes a strong case for reducing requirements in order to spur infill development and promote the reuse of older buildings.

Friday, May 24, 2013

The Use of Bicycles as Disaster Relief Tools

Could this be the new frontier for disaster response?
Source: Bikeportland.org
Natural disasters strike throughout the world on a daily basis. So many occur throughout the year that we won’t even hear about most of them from our regular news source. What we do hear about is the extreme ruin from building crumbling earthquakes, hurricanes that grind a city to standstill, entire blocks completely ravaged by tornadoes, record shattering snowstorms. All of these disasters happen routinely and when they do, emergency plans are called into action. For many, those plans heavily rely on traditional means of transportation, such as an automobile, bus or rail lines to move goods, shuttle people or even to evacuate the city. But history has shown that in situations such as these, traditional methods yield anything but traditional results and typically solutions are not usually viable means of mobility.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Suburbia as Smart Growth

This may not make you very comfortable to hear.  Suburbia may have inadvertently arranged itself, despite our grumblings and crinkled noses, in a manner that shockingly resembles that of Smart Growth or New Urbansim.  Now before you brush me off as some mild-mannered troll, let me say that I do not mean all of suburbia.  I’m not talking about single-family housing (there is no hope for that), but rather I’m referring to multifamily housing.  An Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC) report states that “since 1970 suburban multifamily housing has been the largest growing family housing market” and currently comprise a quarter of the housing units in the suburbs.  It goes on to say that these units are typically built 20 to 30 an acre, which is a sufficient density, according to an Access report, for a bus or even light rail corridor.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Vintage Bicycles Boom



Peugeot in the Portland snow. Source: Hart Ryan Noecker
                   
            If Portland is known for one thing other than rain, it’s bikes. Lots of them. Take a look at what types of bikes most people are riding and you’ll see skinny tire, steel frame 10-speed bikes from decades past. Or, as some may say, “vintage bikes." And by vintage, I am referring to bicycles that hark back to an era of cycling simplicity, from the 1970’s through the 1990’s.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Hiking the Fines for Bicyclists Breaking Traffic Laws


Chicago is taking action against bicyclists that break traffic laws and drivers and passengers that open their doors onto bicyclists by subjecting them to pay steeper fines. 

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced the fines would increase from $25 to a minimum of $50 and a maximum of $200 for bicyclists that violate traffic laws. Additionally, passengers and drivers that “door” a bicyclist would face a fine increase from $500 to $1,000. Fines for leaving a door open would double to $300.
Two-way Protected Bicycle Lanes on Dearborn Street, Credit: John Greenfield

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Absenteeism and Overtime Pay in Trimet


       Trimet has recently made the news for its problematic overtime policy for bus and rail operators.  Revelations show a lack of regulation at both the State level and within Trimet itself.  Current Trimet rules state that light rail operators are required to take seven hours off between shifts, operators can’t work more than 17 hours during a 24 hour period, and that after 13 straight days of working, bus and rail operators are required to take the next day off.  A recent article reported that a single Trimet bus driver earned upwards of $116,624 in 2012, with $64,408 of that being overtime pay.  Apparently working 70 hours a week for fifty-two weeks straight is a lucrative decision.  Or is it?


Saturday, May 4, 2013

Survey Says . . .

The Metro Climate Smart Communities Online Survey was conducted between March 26th and April 8th 2013 by Davis, Hibbitts, & Midghall, Inc. (DHM Research), in partnership with Opt-In to help Metro form a strategy to meet the State of Oregon’s 2007 requirement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from cars,

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

CRC and Evolving Transportation Funding


Over the past week or so there have been a number of articles written about Portland's own CRC project from an outside perspective. DC Streetsblog in particular has taken an interest with the recent press the CRC has received. Secretary LaHood's final appearance before the House and President Obama listed the CRC as one of the potential projects for New Starts funding. Regardless of your stance on the CRC, this is a prime example of a conflict between more traditional transportation planning and the evolving realities of funding today.

Monday, April 22, 2013

Do Not Remove the NB I-5 HOV Lane, Please!

This article is from September of last year, but it appears to be a timeless discussion regarding the northbound (NB) I-5 HOV lane in North Portland. It is no surprise why the HOV lane was implemented along this corridor in the first place: a demand control strategy to get more people to share rides or take transit. Let's look back a few years: the HOV lane was implemented along the NB I-5 in North Portland and another southbound (SB) HOV lane was implemented in Clark County, WA, just north of the Interstate Bridge. In 2005, the SB lane was removed, but the NB lane continues through North Portland.